History of Jihad against
the Hindus of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (638 -- Ongoing)
How the Jihadis mercilessly
vandalized Hindus of Pakistan,
India and Bangladesh and wiped out Hinduism from some
parts of India viz., Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Fierce and persistent
Hindu resistance to the Islamic Jihad prevented the complete Islamization of
India
Unlike the complete
Islamization of Persia, Egypt,
Mesopotamia, Turkey,
North Africa, the Islamization of India was
never complete. After more than one millennium of Muslim Tyranny from 715 up to
1761, more than 70 percent of the population of India remained Hindu. This was NOT
due to any Muslim charity or benevolence, since the murderous and savage
beastlike Muslims have none of these characteristics.
The Muslim tyranny in India was as
blood-thirsty and insidious as it was in all parts of the globe that were
unfortunate to be trampled by the Jihadis. The Hindus suffered initial setbacks
due to the innocuous but ill-founded belief amongst them, as amongst all other
non-Muslims, that the Muslims too were normal human beings, who would after a
victory, settle down to govern the defeated population. But once the nightmare
of Muslim tyranny began, the Hindus grew wiser relatively faster than most of
the other unfortunate victims of the Islamic Jihad.
Unlike the Zoroastrian
Persians, the Hindus never surrendered to the Muslim tyrants. They waged a
relentless and violent struggle against the Muslims.
It was the valiant
Hindu resistance that put paid all the savagery of the Muslims to convert all
the Hindus to Islam at the pain of death.
When fortune favored
them, the Hindus returned in almost equal measure, the barbarism of the Muslims
and struck fear in Muslim hearts for Hindu warriors like Krishna Deva Raya,
Rani Durgavati, Shivaji, and Sikhs (who are a Hindu sect) like Guru Gobind
Singh, Banda Singh Bahadur and many others. The reason why the Hindus survived
thirteen centuries of savage Muslim tyranny was that they learnt that the art
of survival in face of a Muslim attack was giving back almost as much as
they got from the beastlike Muslims.
We use the qualifier
"almost" as the Hindus slaughtered the Muslims on the battlefield, but did not
go to the extent of slaughtering Muslim civilians and giving them the choice of
Hinduism or death, Hindus did not molest Muslim women en masse, neither did
they destroy, en masse, all Mosques, nor did they build Hindus temples over
them (the Babri Masjid-Ramjanabhomi struggle being a one off and very belated
case). Never did the Hindus, after a victory, impose a penal tax like the
jaziya on all Muslims and reduce the Muslims to such a state of servitude, that
for Muslims dying would be more preferable than living under a tyrannous Hindu
rule. There is no record of the defeated Muslims saving their skins by either
jumping in to the common fire (as the Hindus did in Jauhar) to avoid converting
to Hinduism.
It was this valiant Hindu
resistance that put paid all the savagery of the Muslims to convert all the
Hindus to Islam at the pain of death. But otherwise the sordid tale of Muslim
savagery was no less brutal from that in other parts of the world overrun by
the Islamic Jihadis.
Muslims invaded India
only four years after they invaded Persia
Very few know that while
the Muslims invaded Persia
in 634, they invaded Sindh in India
on the orders of the gangster Umar (the Muslim Khalifa) in 638, just a gap of
four years. But while Persia
succumbed in seventeen years by 651, Muslims took seven hundred years to
overrun India (today Sindh
is a part of a Muslim country called Pakistan that was carved out of
Hindu India in 1947). And even after that they could not rule India in peace.
The Hindu resistance was
not just fierce, but it kept increasing in ferocity till with the Marathas, the
Hindus overtook the Muslims in their ferocity. It was this lesson which the
Hindus learnt from the Muslims and applied against the Muslims, that led to the
Hindu (Maratha) victories against the beast-like Muslims. It was the Marathas
who presaged President Bush when he said "We will hunt down our enemies" The
Marathas literally hunted down the Muslims. The only other case of a Muslim
defeat in face of such tactics was in Ethiopia
and Southern Sudan (Nubia)
where the African Christians of Nubia used guerilla tactics against
the Muslims to hunt them down and finally to defeat them.
Foul Tactics used by
the Muslims against Indians (Hindus)
Although the Arab Muslims
on the orders of the gangster Caliph Umar, attacked India in 638, they were repeatedly
defeated by the Rajas of Makara (Makran) and Sindh. The Arab chroniclers then
wrote derisive accounts of the reasons for their defeats at the hands of the
Hindus by saying that the Hindus practice Voodoo and Black Magic and so bring
Jinns and Shaitan to help them in war. Hence the Arabs cannot defeat them, the
way the Arabs could easily defeat the Persians and the Byzantines.
But the Hindus were
tenacious fighters. We need only to remember how the Greeks under Alexander
overcame the Persian Achemanian empire in a few years, after which they
attacked India, but the Hindus contested the Greeks so fiercely and harassed
the Greek army so much that inspite of the Greeks securing a costly victory in
the battle along the river Hydaspes (Vitasta, today's Jhelum), the Greek troops
mutinied and refused to advance further into India.
How the Muslims
blackmailed a guard to open the door of the fort of Debal
The Muslims too had a
tough job with the Hindus. After an unsuccessful campaign of more than eighty
years from 638 C.E., the Muslims ultimately captured the Fort of Deval (Debal
near modern Karachi)
by deceit, by kidnapping the three children of the chief guardsman of the fort
of Debal, beheading one and threatening to behead the other two. With this
blackmail, they forced him to leave one of the secret trap doors open, after
they had feigned retreat. Due to this betrayal, the Muslims could finally sink
their ugly claws into India
under their beast-like leader Mohammed-ibn-Qasim (Mohammed bin Kasim).
The Hindus never forgot
this treachery and eventually learnt from it . In this treacherous attack, the
Muslims kidnapped two princesses of the King Dahirsen (Raja Dabir) of Debal.
The leader of the Muslim brigands, Qasim and sent them as captives to the
Khilafa (Caliph), as a gift with a message that they were royal virgins, meant
to be ravished by his holiness (sic) the lecherous Caliph himself. But these
princesses outsmarted the Caliph.
The two princesses tore
apart their hymen with their own hands and told the caliph that their modesty had
already been violated by Qasim. The Caliph did not believe them, but when he
saw for himself the ruptured hymens, he was convinced that Qasim had violated
the modesty of the princesses and then sent them over to him. The thought that
Qasim had fooled him so enraged the lecherous Caliph that he summoned Qasim to
present himself at Baghdad.
With Qasim in chains, the Caliph accused him of betrayal. Although Qasim
pleaded his innocence, the Caliph, asked for Qasim to be locked in a barrel
with nails stuck on the inside and had him rolled down a hill.
Qasim died a cruel but a
well deserved death. And the first generation of Hindus whom this beast-like
Muslim had tormented and slaughtered, received poetic justice in the death of
this accursed Muslim general who vandalized Sindh.
Over
(0 vote)